In the field of intellectual property law, the matter of evidence is crucial. Traditionally, electronic timestamping offered a solution. However, these methods remain limited by national frameworks. Conversely, blockchain is a global, reliable, accessible alternative that could become a prominent international standard.
How Blockchain Evidence Works
Blockchain is a decentralized technology characterized by transparency and security. Unlike centralized systems, it operates without a single control authority. Each transaction is recorded in a shared ledger, creating a chain of tamper-proof information. Public blockchains are accessible to all, similar to an indestructible public ledger, while private blockchains restrict access. This structure ensures data remains immutable and unalterable.
The system’s security is maintained by miners, who validate transactions by solving complex calculations in exchange for rewards, ensuring the integrity of the information.
How to Use Blockchain for Proof
- Create a Hash: The document is converted into a unique string of numbers and letters (a hash).
- Record on the Blockchain: The hash is registered in the blockchain through a minor financial transaction, making it permanent.
- Verification: To prove authenticity, simply compare the current document’s hash with the one on the blockchain. A match confirms its authenticity.
Traditional Solutions vs. Blockchain
Traditional evidence solutions, although effective, are often limited to national jurisdictions, posing obstacles internationally. Procedures like notary records or the Soleau envelope do not offer universal protection. Blockchain, however, being open source, offers universal timestamping based on mathematical rules, lowering entry barriers and providing an immutable and traceable proof system.
Various Use Cases
- Creation Protection:
- Ongoing Protection: Blockchain timestamps each version of a creation (e.g., fashion, jewelry), providing continuous coverage, even for unfinished works.
- Pre-Patent Protection: During R&D phases, blockchain proves the existence of unpatented inventions, avoiding the need for immediate patent filing.
- Contributor Traceability: In collaborative projects, blockchain identifies each contribution, reducing authorship disputes.
- Electronic Signatures: Introduced in France in 2000 and standardized in the EU by the eIDAS Regulation, electronic signatures now include three types: simple, advanced, and qualified. Blockchain is increasingly used in this area to ensure integrity and authenticity, meeting the criteria for simple and advanced signatures. With the implementation of eIDAS 2 in 2024, blockchain could be integrated into qualified electronic signature systems.
Current Limitations and Future Prospects
In France, the legal recognition of blockchain evidence is mainly limited to the financial sector. For example, Ordinance No. 2016-520 authorized blockchains to record and transfer unlisted financial assets, like minibonds. Ordinance No. 2017-1674 and Decree No. 2018-1226 further extended their use of shared electronic financial security records. The PACTE Law of 2019 strengthened this by authorizing the recording and circulation of financial assets on the blockchain, including stocks and bonds.
At the European level, Regulation 910/2014/EU, effective since July 1, 2016, validates electronic signatures and timestamps, implicitly including blockchain, as admissible evidence in court, granting them similar legal value to handwritten signatures.
French law relies on a mixed system of evidence: the principle of freedom of evidence with exceptions for legal proof, mainly applied to legal acts. Perfect proof includes written documents (authentic or private), judicial admissions, decisive oaths, and reliable copies. Imperfect proofs, such as blockchain, are subject to the judge’s discretion and do not have predefined probative value by law.
Therefore, it is advisable to use a bailiff’s report. While verifying a digital fingerprint in the blockchain is technically simple and achievable via open-source tools, the judge cannot perform this manipulation. A bailiff, acting as a judicial officer, provides this report, offering technical proof to the judge and facilitating the use of blockchain evidence in legal proceedings.
Conclusion
Although blockchain is still considered imperfect proof under French law, its recognition is growing. It could soon become a global standard, surpassing traditional methods. Blockchain is redefining the framework of evidence in intellectual property, offering a solution adapted to the challenges of an international market.
Dreyfus Law Firm offers expert guidance at every stage of creation protection. Our mastery of legal subtleties and global market experience ensures optimal, tailored protection for your specific needs.
Dreyfus Law Firm works in close collaboration with a global network of specialized intellectual property lawyers.
Join us on social media!