The question of whether Birkenstock sandals can be considered works of applied art and therefore eligible for copyright protection is a central topic in intellectual property law. Copyright protects works that exhibit originality and creativity. However, not all objects or designs qualify for this form of protection. This article analyzes whether Birkenstock sandals meet the necessary criteria for such protection, drawing on the principles of intellectual property law and recent legal precedents.
Sommaire
Judicial Findings on Birkenstock sandals’ artistic merit
· The German Federal Supreme Court’s ruling
In a decision number I ZR 16/24 dated February 20, 2025, the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) ruled that Birkenstock’s sandal designs do not meet the necessary criteria to be considered works of applied art protected by copyright. The Court clarified that, to benefit from copyright, the product must demonstrate a certain level of creativity and personal choice. Birkenstock sandals, primarily designed for functionality and comfort, were deemed insufficiently creative to meet this criterion.
Distinction between art and design
The Court also clarified the distinction between artistic works and functional designs. Artistic works are created primarily for their aesthetic value, while functional designs, like Birkenstock sandals, are intended for practical use. The minimalist design of Birkenstock sandals, emphasizing ergonomic support, was seen as serving practical goals rather than artistic expression
Originality and eligibility for copyright protection
Criteria for originality
Originality is a fundamental requirement for copyright protection. A work must be the personal creation of its author, reflecting creative and free choices. In the case of Birkenstock sandals, while their design may be considered distinctive due to its ergonomic benefits, it lacks the artistic originality needed to qualify as a work eligible for copyright protection.
Implications for intellectual property protection
The absence of copyright protection does not mean that Birkenstock’s designs go unprotected. The company can still seek protection through other forms of intellectual property, such as design patents or trademarks, which safeguard the visual appearance of products and their brand identity. However, these protections focus more on the design’s utility or branding rather than the artistic expression of the product.
The design of Birkenstock sandals
Functional design vs artistic expression
Birkenstock sandals are famous for their functional design, which prioritizes comfort and practicality. Features such as arch support and adjustable straps contribute to their popularity. However, these functional elements do not seem to meet the threshold of artistic creativity required for copyright protection. The minimalist design, although distinctive, is more focused on functionality than on aesthetic creativity.
Minimal artistic expression
The design of Birkenstock sandals, consisting primarily of a simple sole and straps, is not characterized by a strong artistic expression. The aesthetic, while iconic, prioritizes ergonomics and comfort, which are more functional than artistic in nature.
Comparison with other artistic designs
Compared to other footwear designs that emphasize ornamental aesthetics (such as high-fashion shoes), Birkenstock sandals appear less creative in terms of artistic expression. Their minimalist design, while practical and well-regarded, does not reflect the level of creativity typically required for applied art works protected by copyright.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Birkenstock sandals do not meet the criteria necessary to benefit from copyright protection. While they are unique and widely recognized for their comfort and functionality, their design is more functional than creative. Therefore, these sandals would likely not be considered artistic works and protected by copyright under current intellectual property standards. This analysis highlights the importance of understanding the distinctions between different forms of intellectual property protection and the specific criteria for each form of protection.
Dreyfus Law Firm works closely with its clients to evaluate whether their designs and trademarks are eligible for protection under intellectual property law. We provide the necessary expertise to help you navigate these complexities and protect your rights.
The Dreyfus Law Firm is partnered with a global network of intellectual property lawyers.
Join us on social media !